Journal Information
|
| Research Areas |
| Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement |
| Guidelines for Authors |
| For Authors |
| Instructions to Authors |
| Copyright forms |
| Submit Manuscript |
| Call for papers |
| Guidelines for Reviewers |
| For Reviewers |
| Review Forms |
| Contacts and Support |
| Support and Contact |
| List of Issues |
| Indexing |
Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS)
ISSN:2141-7016
| Abstract: In this paper logistic and non-logistic cumulative (sigmoidal) models that have fairly equal degree of predictions are compared for their peak point occurrences. It is discovered that only logistic (Hubbert) models have their peaks at half way to the ultimate recovery. Non-logistic models peak not necessarily at half way (but at some other point) to the ultimate recovery (see table 1). Peaking of logistic and non-logistic models are functions of the models, and not geology. Empirical experience revealed that even with different logistic models the same historical data gives different peaks and ultimate values; revealing that these values are mainly functions of the models, and not geology. When the historical data is large enough all the logistic models tend to peak at half way to the ultimate (central limit theorem). Peak production could therefore occur somewhere other than at half way to the ultimate recovery depending on the mathematical model used and is basically a function of the model if the historical data is not large. |
| Keywords: Petroleum production, Peak petroleum, ultimate value, Hubbert concept, logistic model, Variation. |
| Download full paper |


Copyright © 2020 Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 2010