Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences: Research Areas

Abstract:
People cut trees despite the global campaign for ecological duty and wellness. This paper intends to draw out the criticisms of philosophy professors on this prevailing socio-ecological phenomenon. Through a qualitative method of research via focus group discussion, the philosophy professors articulated that the current socio-ecological dilemma is attributed to conflict of interests, issues on central importance, and intrusion of opportunities. Conflicting interests are manifested in the tensions between binary realities such as survival versus ecological responsibility; environmental justice versus economic life; ideal versus pragmatic principles; and stewardship versus dominion over natural resources. Issues on central importance were explored in anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, and biocentrism. Intrusion of opportunities enticed by the flourishing of industrialization and commercialization override the peoples� traditional treatment of natural resources. These were the critiques� grounds in respecting rather than condemning the peoples� options and actions. Furthermore, they asserted that changing the mindset of the people should not be regarded as purely philosophical but rather a multi and interdisciplinary responsibility � implying their adherence to postmodernism whereby philosophy is just one among the many contributors of knowledge.

Keywords: philosophical analysis, ecology, logging, qualitative research, philippines

Download full paper