
Journal Information
|
| Research Areas |
| Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement |
| Guidelines for Authors |
| For Authors |
| Instructions to Authors |
| Copyright forms |
| Submit Manuscript |
| Call for papers |
| Guidelines for Reviewers |
| For Reviewers |
| Review Forms |
| Contacts and Support |
| Support and Contact |
| List of Issues |
| Indexing |

| Abstract: Self- One of the two goals determined for the public employment regime in the 10th Development Plan prepared in 2012 is flexible working and the other is performance evaluation. In order to measure the success, efficiency and efforts of all teachers affiliated to the ministry according to the Ministry of Education Teacher Appointment and Relocation Regulation, the directors of the educational institution they work at are evaluated at the end of each academic year. " It was arranged in accordance with the qualitative research design. It was conducted with in-depth interviews, one of the qualitative research methods. The study group was composed of twenty teachers who were actively working in Ankara in the 2017-2018 academic year. Teachers were interviewed using purposeful sampling method. Teachers' opinions were based on their responses to open-ended questions. It has been analyzed with content analysis technique. With the MEB performance evaluation system, its aim is to transform education by ensuring the standardization of both education and teachers. It has been concluded that teachers who think rationally will not be evaluated objectively, that there will be relationships of interest in the evaluation of parents and students, and that subjective situations such as us or not will arise in the evaluation. As a result of the research, it was found that standard exams would not show teacher success. |
| Keywords: Standardization , Teacher Performance, Performance Evaluation, Performance Measurement |
| Download full paper |
