
Journal Information
|
| Research Areas |
| Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement |
| Guidelines for Authors |
| For Authors |
| Instructions to Authors |
| Copyright forms |
| Submit Manuscript |
| Call for papers |
| Guidelines for Reviewers |
| For Reviewers |
| Review Forms |
| Contacts and Support |
| Support and Contact |
| List of Issues |
| Indexing |

| Abstract: The persistent shortage of behavioral health professionals poses a critical barrier to accessible and effective clinical psychology services. This study advances collaborative evaluation theory by testing the MCE within psychology training contexts to address barriers contributing to shortages in the behavioral health workforce. Using a mixed-methods design, three university-based evaluators partnered with six collaboration members to implement the MCE in a six-month workforce development pilot program that included practicum placements, peer mentoring, and leadership workshops. Quantitative survey data from 45 trainees and qualitative thematic insights from focus groups (n = 8) were analyzed using both outcome assessment and mechanism identification approaches. Results demonstrated substantial improvements in trainee confidence and organizational support, with mediation analysis revealing that organizational support partially mediated the relationship between MCE implementation and individual outcomes. Implementation analysis suggests that the framework is scalable across three intensity levels, yielding a positive return on investment through improved retention. These findings establish collaborative evaluation as an evidence-based approach that addresses accountability and developmental needs, while contributing to solutions for the workforce shortage. |
| Keywords: Clinical Psychology; Behavioral Health; Collaborative Evaluation; Model For Collaborative Evaluations; Workforce Development |
| Download full paper |
